The President’s job

One of the most important considerations in the upcoming election is how the candidates see the president’s duty to protect all Americans. And who they consider to be covered by the definition of “all Americans”.

That encompasses more than homeland security, health care reform, free trade agreements, immigration and foreign policy. It not only includes….but starts with the right to live in America, with the emphasis on live.

The fact is that the president has a limited but substantial and broad-based role in protecting life and defending the most vulnerable in society. Here are five examples of why it matters that the president is pro-life:

And they are listed and spelled out there in a clear and concise summary.

Implicit in them, I think, is a sixth: the president’s ability to name justices to the Supreme Court. An activist court can radically change the laws of the land and the fabric of society for generations. The judicial philosophy of the president will determine that.

Here’s some insight into one of the three leading contenders.

When the nomination of John Roberts to be chief justice of the Supreme Court came up in the Senate in 2005, Sen. Barack Obama argued that the role of a justice is to favor the “weak” over the “strong.”

Besides being wrong (that that’s the role of a justice), it’s clearly incoherent with Sen. Obama’s refusal to protect the weakest among us, the unborn children.

But about his perception of a Supreme Court justice’s role…

Obama expressed disappointed that when he interviewed John Roberts he could not get the judge to reveal more of his personal feelings. “Judge Roberts confessed that, unlike maybe professional politicians, it is not easy for him to talk about his values and deeper feelings,” Obama said. “That is not how he is trained.”

Rather than trying to get up-close-and-personal with Roberts, Obama should have listened more carefully to the judge’s testimony in the Senate Judiciary Committee. It clearly explained why judges must not consider who is “weak” and who is “strong” in a case, or consult their personal sympathies in making decisions that must be based on the facts and the law.

“Judges are like umpires. Umpires don’t make the rules; they apply them,” said Roberts. “I will decide every case based on the record, according to the rule of law, without fear or favor, to the best of my ability. And I will remember that it’s my job to call balls and strikes, and not to pitch or bat.”

We need a president who understands the job description with that kind of clarity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *