Since some people are all about ‘choice’…

…why not give people one on how their children are educated? That’s another significant issue that separates the presidential candidates. Sen. John McCain brought up the issue of schools at the Saddleback Civil Forum, emphasizing his position as “Choice and competition, choice and competition…charter schools, homeschools, voucher systems…all families should have the same opportunities.”

The WSJ’s Opinion Journal has this sort-of wonkish piece that does break it all down into what’s working, and where school choice is heading.

Washington is the best example of three important educational conclusions: School choice (charter schools and vouchers) is improving the education of students; it is wildly popular among parents with children in public schools; and it provokes vigorous opposition from by teachers unions and the liberal political establishment. And it is an issue that deeply divides the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates, which means the November election may well determine its future.

So look at the differences between the two candidates on school choice. Starting with Sen. Obama….no, starting with the teacher’s union that strongly opposes school choice and carries political clout.

The National Education Association says “there is no need to set up new threats to schools for not performing” (they have that backwards); that “vouchers were not designed to help low-income children” (but they do); and “despite desperate efforts to make the voucher debate about school choice and improving opportunities for low-income students, vouchers remain an elitist strategy.” But of course there is nothing elitist about helping low-income children leave failed public schools.

Now what about Sen. Obama?

Barack Obama’s thinking matches the NEA’s. In February he said, “If there was any argument for vouchers, it was, ‘Let’s see if the experiment works.’ And if it does, whatever my preconception, you do what is best for the kids.” But when that drew public attention, his campaign reminded us “that throughout his career he has voted against voucher proposals” and his education plan “does not include vouchers, in any shape or form.”

(an important reversal, based on pressure) 

 Earlier this summer he spoke of his opposition to vouchers and the “tired rhetoric about vouchers and school choice”–very similar to the language the NEA president used in criticizing John McCain for embracing “the tired old rhetoric on vouchers.”

Which is always tired old rhetoric intended to shut down the conversation.

But McCain is talking about it plenty.

Sen. McCain is of the opposite judgment; he is strongly for school choice. His Web site says, “Public education should be defined as one in which our public support for a child’s education follows that child into the school the parent chooses,” and “school choice for all who want it, and expansion of Opportunity Scholarships . . . will all be a part of a serious agenda of education reform.”

Reform is about change, from the intolerable failure of our public schools to an improved system of opportunities for families. So, who’s the candidate of change?

We have to get this right. Children are the hope of the future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *