The last 24 hours…

This week marked two major historical events with two history making sequels. On the anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s passionate ‘I Have a Dream’ speech, the first African-American presidential nominee delivered his acceptance speech in front of the largest outdoor stadium crowd and the largest worldwide audience via technology. And just about on the anniversary of the women’s right to vote, the Republican party named the first woman ever to the presidential ticket as a running mate to the nominee.

How did they unfold? Rapidly. Within a roughly 15 hour span overnight from Thursday to Friday.

On the day of Obama’s speech, Sen. John McCain ran only one television ad, congratulating Obama for his success and achievement, noting the historically important day. “Well done,” he concluded. It was classy.

As for the Obama speech, the grandiose setting turned out to be impressive and inspiring. When he strolled out to thundering applause, it was something to behold. When he began to speak, it was a special moment for everyone who remembers the terrible racial tensions of Dr. King’s day and even after. No matter what your party, you had to be touched by what the scene represented, while the crowd continued to roar.

But wait….within minutes, the speech devolved into partisan attacks on John McCain. Obama unleased accusations and criticisms, one after another, and it started sounding like another of the string of stump speeches of the past several months. In that setting, he could have ennobled, inspired, elevated. But he criticized and complained, with the list of what’s wrong in America. Followed by such a sweeping list of all solutions he promised, the montage of them all made it into Jon Stewart’s opening routine on ‘The Daily Show’ Friday evening.

Plenty of people – media and common folks – were surprised.

“This was not a classic Barack Obama speech,” said Stephen Hess of the Brookings Institution, who has studied conventions since 1952. “It was not an elegant speech. But that may have been on purpose.”

Republican pollster David Winston warned that Obama ran the risk of damaging his unifier image by launching bare-knuckled thrusts at his opponent.

“His attacks on McCain were pretty tough, and that’s the one element of his speech where he was in danger of conflicting with his brand,” said David Winston, a Republican pollster.

“The question is: Will viewers interpret that as a harsh attack, or will they just view it as a contrast?”

One questions is….why didn’t he rise above this attack level, especially on such an auspicious day? He overlooked Dr. King, he overlooked McCain’s congratulatory ads.

This morning, John McCain’s dramatic announcement of Sara Palin as his running mate drew a quick criticism from the Obama campaign. Which came off so badly, it was quickly reversed by Obama himself.

Obama, who is eager to win over female voters who backed his rival Hillary Rodham Clinton in the primaries, blamed the mixed messages about McCain’s choice, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, on campaign aides with a “hair trigger.”

Reaction flaming through the media today has revealed the partisan fault lines of some. I’ve heard one critic on a PBS show with Bill Moyers complain that Palin is a “ferocious anti-choice” candidate, echoing the worst refrain of the day from the aggressively pro-abortion forces who are railing at this particular choice.

The reporting in this WaPo piece was at least fair in its choice of language.

In choosing Palin, McCain also doubles down on the maverick argument; Palin is the face of reform in the Republican party nationally and is clearly not of Washington — a key element of her biography given how negative voter sentiment toward the nation’s capital is currently.

Palin is also strongly pro-life and well liked by conservatives of all stripes, and her selection will be greeted with a huge sign of relief among those within the Republican base who feared that McCain might pick a pro-choice candidate like Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) or former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge.

Pause for a moment and realize the significance of a major media outlet using the term “pro-life”. The style books these days require them all to rely on what has become their instant disqualifier: ‘anti-choice’. Good for WaPo for the honesty.

Furthermore, they credit the Alaskan governor for the tough anti-corruption reputation she swiftly earned in her state in winning and carrying out an administrative role (as opposed to the legislative of the other three candidates on presidential tickets).

Palin won quick confirmation from the fiscal conservative wing of the party in the form of Club For Growth president Pat Toomey. “At a time when many Republicans are still clinging to pork-barrel politics, Governor Palin has quickly become a leader on this issue,” said Toomey. “She is a principled reformer who understands how badly wasteful spending has marred the Republican brand.”

She’s had the honesty and integrity to hold her own party up to the highest standards, which the rest of the country is just learning. Today.

Palin’s newness on the national scene is both her greatest strength and her biggest weakness.

On the one hand, she will be greeted as a fresh face with a compelling personal story that voters will likely react well to. (Palin also has a son serving with the Army in Iraq, an interesting parallel with Democratic V.P. nominee Joe Biden.)

On the other, picking Palin complicates the argument forwarded by McCain that Obama’s short resume makes him ill-equipped to be commander in chief. In picking a candidate who has been a statewide elected official for less than two years, McCain will be hard pressed to argue that experience in public life is a critical component of serving in national office.

But that also takes the ammunition Obama’s campaign fired so quickly at Palin….out of their hands as well. How can they claim lack of experience disqualifies her for being vice-president, when Barack Obama arguably lacks experience to be president?

In Palin’s speech in Dayton today, she was positive, uplifiting and spirited. This part said a lot:

People expect us to govern with clear convictions, goodwill, and a servant’s heart.

It’s a new day.

0 Comment

  • This is awesome. I knew when I read the headline during my lunch break today on McCain’s VP choice that my prayer of the rosary this morning was answered! I didn’t know who Sarah Palin was, but when I found out she is the mother of 5 AND juggles being a highly favorable governor, I knew this was history in the making. Contrast her with Hilary Clinton…this is a real woman for sure. My enthusiasm for this election is keyed up for sure. This is exciting stuff!!

  • John McCain could not have made a better choice. This is the first time I have felt any enthusiasm to vote for a McCain ticket. Instead of an “experienced” bureaucrat, he picked a real person with real beliefs. Her personal appeal might very well overshadow both Obama and McCain.

  • I haven’t seen this much excitement from conservatives in years. She’s a great pick because at once, she firms up the base behind the ticket and she could possibly reach out to women voters. And at first blush, she seems great.

  • I was listening to Sheila this morning on Morning Air (Relevant Radio) and she is so right about the MEDIA being all over Sarah Palin, digging for dirt. The volleys from the democrat camp have been mild in comparison. The way they are out to nail this woman is just so nasty and sexist. It’s all about abortion rights! It’s got to be. The suggestion that she can’t govern because she should be home with her children is the latest outrageous development. My heart goes out to her and her family. And Levi Johnston’s family. I can’t think of a single candidate who has been subject to this much invasive scrutiny.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *