Apr 30

He has used other bluffs to their fullest extent. Now the president and his team are playing his  ’killed Osama bin Laden’ card for all it’s worth. Is it a gamble?

I think so. For many reasons. But first, let me just say I’m very uncomfortable with the president of the United States ‘gloating‘ over this or any other killing, even though this one took out a deadly public enemy who eluded allied forces for about a decade.

With the May 1 anniversary of Osama bin Laden’s killing upon us, the White House is going to great lengths to remind everyone all about it. For starters, there’s Joe Biden’s new stock phrase: “Bin Laden is dead, and General Motors is alive.” Then there’s the ad suggesting that Mitt Romney wouldn’t have had the guts to approve the raid. And it culminates with an interview of President Obama by NBC’s Brian Williams that airs next week from the White House Situation Room, notes Politico. That’s where the now-iconic photo was taken of top officials watching the raid.

“Few presidents have talked about the killing of an individual enemy in such an expansive way,” says the New York Times in a story today about the strategy. It could be a risky one.

It started with a weird and, I think, unpresidential ‘victory lap’ a year ago, as Saturday Night Live captured in a ripe parody. Lately, it’s been ramping up as a campaign boast, and that gets us up to speed, sort of. As much as I don’t want us to be ‘at speed’ with this one.

Senior Obama campaign adviser Robert Gibbs defended the campaign’s use of the event in a recent Web video and in a speech from Vice President Joe Biden. Meanwhile, senior Romney adviser Ed Gillespie characterized the political steps surrounding the death as a “bridge too far.”

Which is the exact term I used when Obama took the already controversial ‘individual mandate’ in his healthcare law (with government requiring citizens to purchase something) to a new level with the HHS mandate (with government requiring citizens to purchase something that violates their conscience).

But I digress…

Team Obama released a video on Friday, partially narrated by former President Bill Clinton, that praised the president’s decision to order the killing of the al Qaeda chief one year from Tuesday and questioned whether Romney would have made the same choice. Biden similarly questioned the former Massachusetts governor in a campaign-style speech on Thursday.

When I first saw it, I found it hard to take seriously or even hard to believe that the president’s team thought it worthy of presidential politics. What would Mitt do? Seriously? You are campaigning on that?

Okay, back to the principled thinking here.

Gillespie, a former aide to former President George W. Bush and former chairman of the Republican National Committee, said utilizing the raid for political purposes is one of the reasons Obama has “become one of the most divisive presidents in American history.”

“He took something that was a unifying event for all Americans, and he’s managed to turn it into a divisive, partisan political attack,” Gillespie said in a separate interview on the same NBC program. “I think most Americans will see it as a sign of a desperate campaign.”

The campaign video received criticism from Republicans, including from 2008 Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain. On Friday, he called the minute-long spot “a cheap political attack ad.”

Nonetheless…

Biden teed off what will likely remain a talking point from Team Obama through the election in a Thursday address that previewed a potential 2012 slogan.

“If you are looking for a bumper sticker to sum up how President Obama has handled what we inherited, it’s pretty simple: Osama bin Laden is dead and General Motors is alive,” Biden said during a speech at New York University, lines Gibbs echoed on Sunday.

The president will pick up the message with what the campaign has billed as the president’s re-election kick-off on Saturday.

So it appears we’ll hear plenty about who and what Obama has killed and allowed to live. An inauspicious strategy, but an unsurprising one, for a campaign used to running on bumper sticker slogans.

UPDATE: Arianna Huffington calls the president’s ‘bin Laden ad’ despicable.

UPDATE II: SEALs slam Obama for using them in election campaign.

Tagged with:
Feb 08

Seems like everything’s a big deal over at the Huffington Post. Which is, after all, what turned that enterprise into an unlikely online media monolith.

AOL even has $315 million to spend on this? Good for Huffington and all the Posters. Like Hilary Rosen, one of the bloggers defending the move against critics…media critics.

As a fairly regular blogger on HuffPost*, I can expertly say three things. I make no money from blogging, and I don’t resent it; I don’t intend to stop, and I don’t agree with critics who challenge the current model.

In fact I am only going to be unhappy if they stop taking my posts… 

The fact is that for part-time opinion writers to be successful, we need platforms. We want our voices to be in the conversation of the day, and we need sites with a LOT of traffic to be effective in doing that.

Well….

In the current tech and information explosion, even the small lone ranger with a computer, smartphone or camera can start or join a worldwide conversation, as YouTube and Twitter prove just about every day.

It’s also interesting that the conversation in which HuffPo is so animatedly engaged is taking place mostly within the arena of liberal media and politics. And yet, some elite liberal media aren’t liking this arrangement, and not giving it long to last in its new iteration.

Arianna Huffington has laughed them off before, and she’s doing it again now. Though she had a tougher time convincing CNN’s Piers Morgan.

Said Morgan: “I’ve got one word for you: MySpace…when a big beast in the media jungle comes and swallows up this free, independent, blog-based, site…I mean it didn’t work for them, did it?  It kind of loses its sexy cool cache.”…

Arianna stepped in and explained that this was “not just buying the company” and that they have no intention of going the Murdoch route and charging for content (which, a cynic would note is easier to do when you don’t pay your writers).

Huffington told Morgan to save that video and check it again next year, with her trademark grinning audacity. 

Who knows? This woman has been many things to many people. Which made her the pre-eminent networker.

Her merger with AOL, she has promised, will not temper the HuffPo’s line. ”Far from changing our editorial approach,” she wrote in an editorial yesterday, ”our culture, or our mission, this moment will be, for HuffPost, like stepping off a fast-moving train and on to a supersonic jet. We’re still travelling toward the same destination, with the same people at the wheel, and with the same goals, but we’re now going to get there much, much faster.”

Quite what this destination might be, she does not specify. But for Arianna Huffington, just getting there quickly has always been the point.

Tagged with:
preload preload preload